Putin Just Gave The Weirdest Interview About Trump And Comey

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

Russian President Vladimir Putin is speaking out about President Donald Trump’s surprise decision to fire FBI Director James Comey on Tuesday. 

We have nothing to do with that,” Putin said Wednesday. 

The Russian president was in hockey gear, getting ready to hit the ice for a game, when he was approached by Elizabeth Palmer of CBS News: 

Palmer asked what effect the move could have on U.S.-Russia relations, already tense amid allegations that Moscow interfered in the 2016 election and with Comey’s firing coming as the FBI was investigating possible links between the Kremlin and Trump associates. 

“There will be no effect,” Putin said via Dmitry Peskov, a press aide who acted as translator. “Your question looks very funny for me. Don’t be angry with me.”

Putin said Trump was acting “in accordance with his law, the Constitution.”

He then suggested Palmer join the hockey game. 

“You see, I am going to play hockey with the hockey fans,” he said. “And I invite you to do the same.” 

Putin scored seven goals in the game as his side won the friendly match by a score of 17-6, according to The New York Times. The newspaper said the match was part of a gala and involved “senior officials, oligarchs and various hockey greats.”

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Read more

Comey revealed that the FBI had possible evidence of collusion with Russia—then Trump fired him

Before FBI Director James Comey was fired, the FBI investigation of Russian involvement in the US election was heating up. According to multiple sources—though denied by the Department of Justice—Comey went to the assistant attorney general to request additional resources for the investigation on Monday. Later that day, Rod Rosenstein and Jefferson Sessions visited Trump to tell him Comey needed to be fired.

On Tuesday, federal prosecutors issued their first grand jury subpoenas based on the FBI investigation. Those subpoenas “represent the first sign of a significant escalation of activity in the FBI’s broader investigation,” according to CNN. That same day, Trump fired Comey.

However, according to the Wall Street Journal, the investigation was in an even higher gear than previously known—for a very, very good reason.

Mr. Comey started receiving daily instead of weekly updates on the investigation, beginning at least three weeks ago, according to people with knowledge of the matter and the progress of the Federal Bureau of Investigation probe. Mr. Comey was concerned by information showing possible evidence of collusion, according to these people.

Comey went to Rosenstein to ask for more resources, not because the investigation was going too slowly, but because the investigation was finding so much.

With his concerns mounting, Mr. Comey last week sought more resources to support the bureau’s investigation, which began last July. He requested additional personnel from Rod Rosenstein, who had been recently installed as the deputy attorney general, overseeing the FBI, people familiar with the discussions said.

And that’s when they fired him.

Read more

Five sad facts about the Capitals’ Game 7 loss to the Penguins

The Washington Capitals are in the business of postseason misery.

The Washington Capitals are sadly no strangers to playoff disappointment. Their 2017 postseason hopes ended at the hands of the Pittsburgh Penguins on Wednesday, and the disappointment was palpable.

Now, the Capitals are left to pick up the pieces on yet another early playoff exit. Just how bad was this Game 7 loss? See for yourself.

The Capitals have never bested the Penguins in a playoff Game 7

Washington has played Pittsburgh in 62 playoff games since 1991. Out of the four times the Capitals have played in a Game 7 against the Penguins, they’ve yet to win a single one.

The Capitals have never reached the Eastern Conference Final with Alex Ovechkin

Ovechkin has played for the Capitals for 12 seasons, and has yet to reach the third round of the Stanley Cup playoffs.

The Penguins were broken, and still won

While the Capitals were arguably the deepest they’ve been in years, the Penguins may have been the weakest. Pittsburgh was without Kris Letang and Matt Murray, and all the while Sidney Crosby was concussed mid-way through the series.

Defensemen Brian Dumoulin, Olli Maatta, and Ron Hainsey ate up the most minutes for the Penguins in Game 7 and they still managed to shut down the deep Capitals’ scoring lineup.


Washington out-chanced Pittsburgh at even strength, and still lost

We know you’ve heard it before, but the Capitals were — by the numbers — the better team at even strength in terms of overall shots.

Braden Holtby’s Vezina-worthy regular season meant nothing

In the regular season, Holtby put up a .925 save percentage with a league-leading nine shutouts. This postseason? He had a .909 save percentage in 13 games, and put up an .877 save percentage in seven games against the Penguins.

Read more