Russell Westbrook broke the fourth wall and became the first meme of the NBA playoffs

*Looks directly into camera*

Playoff games always give us some special moments. There are the ones that involve actual gameplay, and others that are just serendipitous happenstances.

This is one of the latter.

The cameras zoomed in on Russell Westbrook and he happened to look right back. It reminded us immediately of Jim Halpert of The Office. (Russ is totally a Jim, by the way. Just think of all the pranks he’s pulled on Kevin Durant.)

Instant meme, if you ask me.

Not everyone is as lucky as Cam Newton.

We understand Russ, we really do.

Read more

Russell Westbrook’s failed 4th quarter takeover was the Thunder’s own decision

Westbrook shot 4-of-18 in the fourth, but in a sense, he had to play that way.

You can already see the headlines and the talk shows and the radio topics and the Twitter takes coming for Westbrook. The next 24 hours will be filled with, why didn’t he pass more? Is he selfish? Does he only care about his own stats?

While James Harden trusted his teammates to score down the stretch, Russell Westbrook did not. Since Westbrook shot 4-of-18 in the fourth quarter, the loss will be blamed on him. It’s a fair point, because if you miss 14 shots in the final quarter, you deserve blame. But it’s also not quite that simple.

Consider the end of the third quarter. When Westbrook went to the bench up 86-74 with two minutes left in the third quarter, the Rockets immediately closed the quarter on a 12-3 run. Consider the lineup he finished much of the fourth quarter with: Steven Adams, Victor Oladipo, Andre Roberson, and Jerami Grant. Would you trust any of them with an open three? Roberson and Oladipo each missed wide open ones in the final five minutes.

Westbrook played a bad fourth quarter and settled for terrible shots as the clock winded down, and nobody can deny that. It’s incredible that a 51-point triple-double can be considered a bad game at this point, but anyone who takes 43 shots opens themselves up for this type of criticism. There will be a lot of takes over the next 24 hours about whether Westbrook was right, wrong, selfish, terrible, or only playing this game for himself. It’s also important to realize: to an extent, this is what the Thunder wanted.

Thunder head coach Billy Donovan could have opted for a more offensive-friendly approach, with Taj Gibson or Doug McDermott or Kyle Singler playing more minutes. But Oklahoma City knew that trying to outscore the Rockets, who had a historic offense this season, would never work. They chose to focus on defense, give Westbrook the ball, and hoped his brilliance could outplay everything.

In the past, that has worked. On Wednesday, it backfired drastically.

In the 115-111 Houston win, it didn’t work. The Thunder now fall to 0-2 in the series that they were underdogs in anyway. They head home, and maybe they can even things up. If not, know that they lost Game 2 playing the style they felt they had to play. How that reflects on Westbrook himself … well, don’t worry, we’ll spend the next 24 hours talking about that.

Read more

Some Republicans Think They May Have A Health Care Deal

WASHINGTON ― GOP moderates and conservatives are nearing a deal on health care that in theory could get the Republican alternative to the Affordable Care Act out of the House and over to the Senate. The changes also might move Republicans even further away from passage ― no one really knows.

The deal, brokered between House Freedom Caucus chairman Mark Meadows (R-N.C.) and Tuesday Group co-chairman Tom MacArthur (R-N.J.), would allow states to get waivers eliminating the so-called community rating provision ― the rule that prohibits insurers from charging higher premiums to people with pre-existing conditions. In order to obtain the waiver, states would have to participate in a federal high-risk pool or establish their own, and satisfy some other conditions.

In exchange for that conservative concession, the amendment would reinstate the Essential Health Benefits that were already taken out of the bill ― though, again, states could waive those provisions as well if they were able to show that doing so would lower premiums, increase the number of people insured, or “advance another benefit to the public interest in the state.”

That’s according to a white paper describing the amendment, which is the result of weeks of negotiation between Meadows and MacArthur. While they have both agreed to the amendment, supposedly representing a number of conservatives and moderates respectively, the amendment is still being reviewed by the Senate and House GOP leadership.

Additionally, with Republicans effectively going back on their repeated promises to guarantee coverage for people with pre-existing conditions, the amendment could lose a number of Republicans who already supported the legislation. In short, even though the Tuesday Group and the Freedom Caucus think they have a deal, Republicans writ large might have nothing.

Leadership is expected to discuss the amendment on a conference call this Saturday with GOP members, but public opinion might also affect the landscape. Republicans are trying to say their amendment will cover people with pre-existing conditions ― because, first, the legislation still claims those people can’t be denied coverage, and second, because there will be high-risk pools for those people if insurance costs dramatically go up for them.

The reality, however, is that insurers would be able to effectively deny coverage by pricing sick people out of the market. 

“This effectively allows states to eliminate the ACA’s guarantee of access to insurance at a reasonable price for people with pre-existing conditions, in the interest of lowering premiums for people who are healthy,” Larry Levitt, senior vice president at the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, said upon seeing a description of the proposal. “It seems to tilt heavily towards what the Freedom Caucus has been looking for.”

Republicans argue that the high-risk pools would then cover those people, taking them out of the regular insurance pool and lowering prices for everyone else, but high-risk pools have traditionally been underfunded by states and the federal government, resulting in poor coverage and high costs for those who need insurance the most.

Those concerns may be significant enough that, even with MacArthur’s blessing, the deal does not win over moderates. The concessions also might not be enough for some conservatives, who have expressed issue with Republicans establishing an advance refundable tax credit to help pay for insurance.

Republicans need 216 votes to pass their health care bill, and based on statements from GOP members, even with the support of the entire Freedom Caucus for the amendment, there may be enough moderate hold-outs to prevent passage anyway. (MacArthur doesn’t count as a convert; he supported the last bill, albeit reluctantly.) 

The amendment wouldn’t seem to address the big concerns moderates have expressed ― like raising the cap on how much insurers can charge seniors or cutting $880 billion from Medicaid. These changes are among the reasons that the Congressional Budget Office predicted the House health care legislation would increase the number of people without insurance by 24 million within a decade.

Many Republicans ― particularly in the Senate ― have said such deep cuts are not acceptable. Just this week, Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) said he couldn’t support a proposal that jeopardized coverage for the approximately 300,000 people in his state dependent on the Affordable Care Act’s Medicaid expansion.

Public opinion has also shifted since the repeal effort began in earnest ― and it has shifted decisively against Republicans and their cause. The Affordable Care Act is more popular than ever, and in a recent Pew Research Center poll, 54 percent of Americans said they trusted Democrats more than Republicans on health care, while just 35 percent said they trusted Republicans more. That’s the biggest advantage for Democrats on health care since 2009.

In short, some leaders in the GOP conference might think they have a deal, but they also might have just found a way to make the bill even more unpalatable for Republicans, thus bringing Congress no closer at all.

Still, Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) suggested that Republicans were getting close to a deal. “We’re in the midst of negotiating sort of finishing touches,” Ryan said Wednesday during a trip to London.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Read more

Open thread for night owls: Goodbye, Bill-O. See ya ’round the falafel stand.

We must now say goodbye to Mr. Falafel himself, the man who vowed to Do It Live, the man who was forever being surprised by how other people ordered their iced tea, the Perv with the Nerve, the Fox host who’s now toast, Mr. Bill O’Reilly.

So, ya know … bye.

An Activists’ Calendar of Resistance Events
Indivisible’s list of Resistance Events & Groups

TOP COMMENTSHIGH IMPACT STORIES

TWEET OF THE DAY

x

Serena Williams won a grand slam while she was pregnant so every man should probably shut up about everything forever.

— Travon Free (@Travon) April 19, 2017

BLAST FROM THE PAST

At Daily Kos on this date in 2014—Bush administration labeled Bundy Ranch-style outlaws domestic terrorists:

The Bundy Ranch controversy has now divided Nevada’s two United States senators. While Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) referred to Bundy’s armed supporters as “domestic terrorists,” his Republican colleague Dean Heller praised them as “patriots.”

Their disagreement begs the question: What do you call someone who owes the United States government a million dollars and threatens violence against federal officials seeking to collect it? Whatever you may believe, for the Bush administration there was no doubt about the answer. The likes of Cliven Bundy and his gun-toting militia allies would indeed be considered domestic terrorists.

That’s the inescapable conclusion from the FBI’s report, Terrorism 2002-2005.

On today’s Kagro in the Morning show: Whee! Chinese trademarks for the whole family! A brief moment of gun sanity in FL. No tax reform while you’re “under audit,” please. US guarantees a Korean war or double your money back! Is Congressional oversight about to get Gorsuched again?

x
Embedded Content

YouTube | iTunes | LibSyn | Support the show via Patreon or Square Cash

Read more